Gemini 3.0 Pro - Ain't That Great!

OP: homebreadprawn
#0 · homebreadprawn · 2025-12-02 17:56:23
I've being seeing alot of love for Gemini 3.0 Pro, but as I see, it just isn't that great.

It gets lost alot. I actually thing GPT5.1 Codex is better for coding.

I really liked 2.5 Flash & Pro for business purposes.
#1 · leach · 2025-12-17 06:57:35
Replying to: homebreadprawn
I've been messing with claude 4.5 opus and it's been pretty good. I haven't messed with gemini 3 much but when I played with it for a couple hours it didn't sem too bad. I've heard you have to kinda give it positive feedback and make it feel nice though.

Have you messed with the image gen? It's kinda crazy
#5 · homebreadprawn · 2025-12-24 18:23:52
Replying to: leach
Yes the image gen is unreal. I love Gemini 2.5 pro and flash. We've spent a small fortune on it this year. The context limits are great but I wouldn't trust using the full amount. 3.0 Flash seems good, but the 3.0 pro, just feels overrated
#2 · ant · 2025-12-19 15:33:22
Replying to: homebreadprawn
Woops, I thought it was the Gemini internet protocol...
#3 · leach · 2025-12-20 04:58:15
Replying to: ant
gemini internet protocol is fun too, what do you use to browse it? I use langrange
#4 · ant · 2025-12-20 22:10:43
Replying to: leach
I don't use Gemini. I don't like it's betrayal of the standard plain-text format with 72-80 characters per line.  Otherwise, Gemini seems like a good idea.
Log in to reply.